Recent announcements regarding the establishment of a Department of Arbitration within the Ministry of Justice have emerged as one of the noteworthy developments in the legal landscape.
At first glance, this may appear to be a purely technical regulation of interest only to legal professionals. However, in reality, it conveys an important message for companies, investors, and businesses engaged in commercial activities.
Today, for investors, it is not sufficient merely to be in the right. Equally important is the ability to foresee how a dispute resolution process will unfold, how long it will take to reach a decision, and to what extent that decision will be enforceable.
This is precisely where arbitration gains significance.
What Is Arbitration?
Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism whereby the parties agree that disputes arising between them, whether existing or potential, will be resolved by one or more arbitrators instead of state courts.
Through an arbitration clause incorporated into their contracts, parties can predetermine the procedure by which disputes will be resolved.
In this way, rather than losing time on jurisdictional disputes once a conflict arises, a pre-agreed dispute resolution mechanism is activated.
Arbitration is widely used particularly in international trade, partnership relations, energy projects, construction contracts, and high-value commercial transactions.
However, arbitration is not a dispute resolution method exclusive to international companies. Under Turkish law, domestic arbitration provisions may also apply to disputes that do not contain a foreign element and where the seat of arbitration is designated as Türkiye.
Accordingly, manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, contractors, subcontractors, shareholders, and other real and legal persons engaged in commercial activities may also prefer to resolve their disputes through arbitration under certain conditions.
Why Do Companies Prefer Arbitration?
The preference for arbitration is not solely due to the workload of the courts. The primary reason lies in the needs of commercial life.
One of the most significant advantages of arbitration is that disputes can be resolved in a shorter period of time.
In Türkiye, lawsuits arising from commercial disputes may, when considering first instance, appellate, and cassation stages together, take several years. Particularly in disputes requiring technical examination or involving high monetary values, proceedings may last between 5 to 10 years.
In arbitration proceedings, however, since the parties can largely determine the procedural rules, the process proceeds in a more controlled manner. Depending on the nature of the dispute, many arbitration proceedings can be concluded within approximately 6 to 18 months.
From a commercial perspective, there is a substantial difference between a dispute lasting for years and one that is resolved within about a year through a final and binding decision.
Prolonged proceedings do not only result in loss of time. Litigation costs, expert fees, attorneys’ fees, and other procedural expenses also increase as the process extends. Therefore, arbitration often provides a financial advantage as well.
Another important advantage of arbitration is that disputes are evaluated by experts in the relevant field. A dispute arising from a construction project does not require the same expertise as one related to an energy investment. In arbitration, parties can ensure that arbitrators with appropriate expertise are appointed.
Furthermore, arbitration proceedings are, as a rule, conducted confidentially. The protection of trade secrets, financial data, internal company information, and contractual relationships from becoming public constitutes a significant advantage, particularly for companies.
Why Is the Arbitration Clause So Important?
Arbitration is not a process that begins after a dispute arises.
In many cases, the fate of arbitration is determined by a few lines written in the arbitration clause at the contract drafting stage.
In practice, while parties tend to focus on the commercial terms of a contract, they often treat dispute resolution clauses as standard boilerplate text. However, in many arbitration disputes, the first issue debated—before the merits of the dispute—is the validity of the arbitration clause itself.
Failure to specify the number of arbitrators, incorrectly designating the arbitration institution, not clearly stating the seat of arbitration, or including conflicting dispute resolution provisions may expose parties to lengthy procedural disputes.
For this reason, the arbitration clause is not merely the final provision of a contract but one of its most strategic components.
Parties may determine not only the use of arbitration but also the seat of arbitration, the applicable law, the arbitration institution, the language of the proceedings, and the number of arbitrators.
Especially in international contracts, these choices have a direct impact on the cost, duration, and enforceability of the dispute resolution process.
Conclusion
Arbitration is not merely a method of dispute resolution to be resorted to once a conflict arises. When properly structured, it becomes a strategic tool for companies in terms of risk management, investment security, and commercial sustainability.
For this reason, legal support in the field of arbitration gains importance not only after a dispute arises but also during contract drafting, the establishment of commercial relationships, and the assessment of risks.
As Demireller Law Firm, we provide legal support to our clients in drafting arbitration clauses, reviewing contracts, representing parties in national and international arbitration proceedings, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, and the management of arbitration-related disputes.
You may contact us to obtain information regarding arbitration processes within the scope of your commercial activities or to request an evaluation of the arbitration provisions in your contracts.
Bir Cevap Yazın